Nonparametric test of consistency between cosmological models and multiband CMB measurements

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present a novel approach to test the consistency of the cosmological models with multiband CMB data using a nonparametric approach. In our analysis we calibrate the REACT (Risk Estimation and Adaptation after Coordinate Transformation) confidence levels associated with distances in function space (\textit{confidence distances}) based on the Monte Carlo simulations in order to test the consistency of an assumed cosmological model with observation. To show the applicability of our algorithm, we confront Planck 2013 temperature data with concordance model of cosmology considering two different Planck spectra combination. In order to have an accurate quantitative statistical measure to compare between the data and the theoretical expectations, we calibrate REACT confidence distances and perform a bias control using many realizations of the data. Our results in this work using Planck 2013 temperature data put the best fit ΛΛCDM model at 95%(∼2σ)95\% (\sim 2σ) confidence distance from the center of the nonparametric confidence set while repeating the analysis excluding the Planck 217×217217 \times 217 GHz spectrum data, the best fit ΛΛCDM model shifts to 70%(∼1σ)70\% (\sim 1σ) confidence distance. The most prominent features in the data deviating from the best fit ΛΛCDM model seems to be at low multipoles 18<ℓ<26 18 < \ell < 26 at greater than 2σ2σ, ℓ∼750\ell \sim 750 at ∼1\sim1 to 2σ2 σ and ℓ∼1800\ell \sim 1800 at greater than 2σ2σ level. Excluding the 217×217217\times217 GHz spectrum the feature at ℓ∼1800\ell \sim 1800 becomes substantially less significance at ∼1\sim1 to 2σ2 σ confidence level. Results of our analysis based on the new approach we propose in this work are in agreement with other analysis done using alternative methods.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.