Paper detail

Nonmonotonic coexistence regions for the two-type Richardson model

In the two-type Richardson model on a graph $\mathcal{G}=(\mathcal{V},\mathcal{E})$, each vertex is at a given time in state $0$, $1$ or $2$. A $0$ flips to a $1$ (resp.\ $2$) at rate $λ_1$ ($λ_2$) times the number of neighboring $1$'s ($2$'s), while $1$'s and $2$'s never flip. When $\mathcal{G}$ is infinite, the main question is whether, starting from a single $1$ and a single $2$, with positive probability we will see both types of infection reach infinitely many sites. This has previously been studied on the $d$-dimensional cubic lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$, $d\geq 2$, where the conjecture (on which a good deal of progress has been made) is that such coexistence has positive probability if and only if $λ_1=λ_2$. In the present paper examples are given of other graphs where the set of points in the parameter space which admit such coexistence has a more surprising form. In particular, there exist graphs exhibiting coexistence at some value of $\frac{λ_1}{λ_2} \neq 1$ and non-coexistence when this ratio is brought closer to $1$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.