Paper detail

Nonlinear simulation of vascular tumor growth with chemotaxis and the control of necrosis

In this paper, we develop a sharp interface tumor growth model in two dimensions to study the effect of both the intratumoral structure using a controlled necrotic core and the extratumoral nutrient supply from vasculature on tumor morphology. We first show that our model extends the benchmark results in the literature using linear stability analysis. Then we solve this generalized model numerically using a spectrally accurate boundary integral method in an evolving annular domain, not only with a Robin boundary condition on the outer boundary for the nutrient field which models tumor vasculature, but also with a static boundary condition on the inner boundary for pressure field which models the control of tumor necrosis. The discretized linear systems for both pressure and nutrient fields are shown to be well-conditioned through tracing GMRES iteration numbers. Our nonlinear simulations reveal the stabilizing effects of angiogenesis and the destabilizing ones of chemotaxis and necrosis in the development of tumor morphological instabilities if the necrotic core is fixed in a circular shape. When the necrotic core is controlled in a non-circular shape, the stabilizing effects of proliferation and the destabilizing ones of apoptosis are observed. Finally, the values of the nutrient concentration with its fluxes and the pressure level with its normal derivatives, which are solved accurately at the boundaries, help us to characterize the corresponding tumor morphology and the level of the biophysical quantities on interfaces required in keeping various shapes of the necrotic region of the tumor. Interestingly, we notice that when the necrotic region is fixed in a 3-fold non-circular shape, even if the initial shape of the tumor is circular, the tumor will evolve into a shape corresponding to the 3-fold symmetry of the shape of the fixed necrotic region.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.