Paper detail

Nonlinear Quantum Search

Although quant mech is linear, there are nevertheless quant sys with multiple interacting particles in which the effective evo of a single particle is governed by a nonlinear eq. This includes Bose-Einstein condensates, which are gov by the Gross-Pitaevskii eq (GPE), which is a cubic nonlin Schrodinger eq (NLSE) with a term propto $|ψ|^2ψ$. Evo by this eq solves the unstruct search prob in const time, but at the novel expense of increasing the time-measurement precision. Jointly optimizing these resources results in an overall scaling of $N^{1/4}$, which is a significant, but not unreasonable, improvement over the $N^{1/2}$ scaling of Grover's algo. Since the GPE effectively approx the multi-particle Schrodinger eq, for which Grover's algo is optimal, our result leads to a quant info-theoretic bound on the num of particles needed for this approx to hold, asymp. The GPE is not the only nonlin of the form $f(|ψ|^2)ψ$ that arises in effective eqs for the evo of real quant phys sys, however: The cubic-quintic NLSE describes light propagation in nonlin Kerr media with defocusing corrections, and the log NLSE describes Bose liquids under certain cond. Analysis of comput with such sys yields some surprising results; e.g., when time-measurement precision is included in the resource accounting, searching a "database" when there is a single correct ans may be easier than searching when there are multiple correct ans. These results lead to quant info-theoretic bounds on the phys resources required for these effective nonlin theories to hold, asymp. Further, strongly reg graphs, which have no global sym, are sufficiently complete for quant search on them to asymp behave like unstruct search. Certain suff complete graphs retain the improved runtime and resource scalings for some nonlin, so our scheme for nonlin, analog quant comput retains its benefits even when some struct is introduced.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.