Paper detail

Nonlinear equilibria and emittance growth in plasma wakefield accelerators with ion motion

The plasma wakefield accelerator may accelerate particles to high energy in a future linear collider with unprecedented acceleration gradients, exceeding the GeV/m range. Beams for this application would have extremely high brightness and, subject to the intense plasma ion-derived focusing, they would achieve densities high enough to induce the plasma ions to collapse into the beam volume. This non-uniform ion density gives rise to strong nonlinear focusing which may lead to deleterious beam emittance growth. The effects of ion collapse and their mitigation has been investigated recently through particle-in-cell simulations, which show that by dynamically matching the beam to the focusing of the collapsed ion distribution, one may avoid serious emittance growth. We extend this work by exploring the near-equilibrium state of the beam-ion system reached after the ions have collapsed, a condition yielding the emittance growth mitigation observed. We show through PIC simulations and analytical theory that in this case a dual electron beam-ion Bennett-type equilibrium distribution is approached. Here, the beam and ion distributions share nearly the same shape, which generates nonlinear transverse electromagnetic fields. We exploit a Bennett-type model to study beam phase space dynamics and emittance growth over time scales much longer than permitted by PIC simulations through use of a 2D symplectic tracking code with Monte Carlo scattering based on Moliere's theory of small angle multiple scattering. We find that while phase space diffusion due to parametric excitations of the beam size due to plasma non-uniformity is negligible, scattering from collapsed ions gives rise to manageable emittance growth in the case of a linear collider. The implications of these results on experiments planned at FACET-II are examined.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.