Paper detail

Nonlinear Digital Post-Processing to Mitigate Jitter in Sampling

This paper describes several new algorithms for estimating the parameters of a periodic bandlimited signal from samples corrupted by jitter (timing noise) and additive noise. Both classical (non-random) and Bayesian formulations are considered: an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is developed to compute the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator for the classical estimation framework, and two Gibbs samplers are proposed to approximate the Bayes least squares (BLS) estimate for parameters independently distributed according to a uniform prior. Simulations are performed to demonstrate the significant performance improvement achievable using these algorithms as compared to linear estimators. The ML estimator is also compared to the Cramer-Rao lower bound to determine the range of jitter for which the estimator is approximately efficient. These simulations provide evidence that the nonlinear algorithms derived here can tolerate 1.4-2 times more jitter than linear estimators, reducing on-chip ADC power consumption by 50-75 percent.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.