Paper detail

Nonlinear Development of the R Mode Instability and the Maximum Rotation Rate of Neutron Stars

We describe how the nonlinear development of the R mode instability of neutron stars influences spin up to millisecond periods via accretion. Our arguments are based on nearly-resonant interactions of the R mode with pairs of "daughter modes". The amplitude of the R mode saturates at the lowest value for which parametric instability leads to significant excitation of a particular pair of daughters. The lower bound on this limiting amplitude is proportional to the damping rate of the daughter modes that are excited parametrically. Based on this picture, we show that if modes damp because of dissipation in a very thin boundary layer at the crust-core boundary then spin up to frequencies larger than about 300 Hz does not occur. Within this conventional scenario the R mode saturates at an amplitude that is too large for angular momentum gain from accretion to overcome gravitational loss to gravitational radiation. We conclude that lower dissipation is required for spin up to frequencies much higher than 300 Hz. We conjecture that if the transition from the fluid core to the crystalline crust occurs over a distance much longer than 1 cm then a sharp viscous boundary layer fails to form. In this case, damping is due to shear viscosity dissipation integrated over the entire star; the rate is slower than if a viscous boundary layer forms. We use statistical arguments and scaling relations to estimate the lowest parametric instability threshold from first principles. The resulting saturation amplitudes are low enough to permit spin up to higher frequencies. Further, we show that the requirement that the lowest parametric instability amplitude be small enough to allow continued spin up imposes an upper bound to the frequencies that may be attained via accretion that may plausibly be about 750 Hz. Within this framework, the R mode is unstable for all millisecond pulsars, whether accreting or not.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.