Paper detail

Nondeterministic automatic complexity of overlap-free and almost square-free words

Shallit and Wang studied deterministic automatic complexity of words. They showed that the automatic Hausdorff dimension $I(\mathbf t)$ of the infinite Thue word satisfies $1/3\le I(\mathbf t)\le 2/3$. We improve that result by showing that $I(\mathbf t)\ge 1/2$. For nondeterministic automatic complexity we show $I(\mathbf t)=1/2$. We prove that such complexity $A_N$ of a word $x$ of length $n$ satisfies $A_N(x)\le b(n):=\lfloor n/2\rfloor + 1$. This enables us to define the complexity deficiency $D(x)=b(n)-A_N(x)$. If $x$ is square-free then $D(x)=0$. If $x$ almost square-free in the sense of Fraenkel and Simpson, or if $x$ is a strongly cube-free binary word such as the infinite Thue word, then $D(x)\le 1$. On the other hand, there is no constant upper bound on $D$ for strongly cube-free words in a ternary alphabet, nor for cube-free words in a binary alphabet. The decision problem whether $D(x)\ge d$ for given $x$, $d$ belongs to $NP\cap E$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.