Paper detail

Noncommutative (generalized) sine-Gordon/massive Thirring correspondence, integrability and solitons

Some properties of the correspondence between the non-commutative versions of the (generalized) sine-Gordon (NCGSG$_{1,2}$) and the massive Thirring (NCGMT$_{1,2}$) models are studied. Our method relies on the master Lagrangian approach to deal with dual theories. The master Lagrangians turn out to be the NC versions of the so-called affine Toda model coupled to matter fields (NCATM$_{1,2}$), in which the Toda field $g$ belongs to certain subgroups of $ GL(3)$, and the matter fields lie in the higher grading directions of an affine Lie algebra. Depending on the form of $g$ one arrives at two different NC versions of the NCGSG$_{1,2}$/NCGMT$_{1,2}$ correspondence. In the NCGSG$_{1,2}$ sectors, through consistent reduction procedures, we find NC versions of some well-known models, such as the NC sine-Gordon (NCSG$_{1,2}$) (Lechtenfeld et al. and Grisaru-Penati proposals, respectively), NC (bosonized) Bukhvostov-Lipatov (NCbBL$_{1,2}$) and NC double sine-Gordon (NCDSG$_{1,2}$) models. The NCGMT$_{1,2}$ models correspond to Moyal product extension of the generalized massive Thirring model. The NCGMT$_{1,2}$ models posses constrained versions with relevant Lax pair formulations, and other sub-models such as the NC massive Thirring (NCMT$_{1,2}$), the NC Bukhvostov-Lipatov (NCBL$_{1,2}$) and constrained versions of the last models with Lax pair formulations. We have established that, except for the well known NCMT$_{1,2}$ zero-curvature formulations, generalizations ($n_{F} \ge 2$, $n_F=$number of flavors) of the massive Thirring model allow zero-curvature formulations only for constrained versions of the models and for each one of the various constrained sub-models defined for less than $n_F$ flavors, in the both NCGMT$_{1,2}$ and ordinary space-time descriptions (GMT), respectively. The non-commutative solitons and kinks of the $ GL(3)$ NCGSG$_{1,2}$ models are investigated.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.