Paper detail

Noncommutative determinants, Cauchy-Binet formulae, and Capelli-type identities II. Grassmann and quantum oscillator algebra representation

We prove that, for $X$, $Y$, $A$ and $B$ matrices with entries in a non-commutative ring such that $[X_{ij},Y_{k\ell}]=-A_{i\ell} B_{kj}$, satisfying suitable commutation relations (in particular, $X$ is a Manin matrix), the following identity holds: $ \mathrm{coldet} X \mathrm{coldet} Y = < 0 | \mathrm{coldet} (a A + X (I-a^{\dagger} B)^{-1} Y) |0 > $. Furthermore, if also $Y$ is a Manin matrix, $ \mathrm{coldet} X \mathrm{coldet} Y =\int \mathcal{D}(ψ, ψ^{\dagger}) \exp [ \sum_{k \geq 0} \frac{1}{k+1} (ψ^{\dagger} A ψ)^{k} (ψ^{\dagger} X B^k Y ψ) ] $. Notations: $ < 0 |$, $| 0 >$, are respectively the bra and the ket of the ground state, $a^{\dagger}$ and $a$ the creation and annihilation operators of a quantum harmonic oscillator, while $ψ^{\dagger}_i$ and $ψ_i$ are Grassmann variables in a Berezin integral. These results should be seen as a generalization of the classical Cauchy-Binet formula, in which $A$ and $B$ are null matrices, and of the non-commutative generalization, the Capelli identity, in which $A$ and $B$ are identity matrices and $[X_{ij},X_{k\ell}]=[Y_{ij},Y_{k\ell}]=0$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.