Paper detail

Nonasymptotic Gaussian Approximation for Inference with Stable Noise

The results of a series of theoretical studies are reported, examining the convergence rate for different approximate representations of $α$-stable distributions. Although they play a key role in modelling random processes with jumps and discontinuities, the use of $α$-stable distributions in inference often leads to analytically intractable problems. The LePage series, which is a probabilistic representation employed in this work, is used to transform an intractable, infinite-dimensional inference problem into a conditionally Gaussian parametric problem. A major component of our approach is the approximation of the tail of this series by a Gaussian random variable. Standard statistical techniques, such as Expectation-Maximization, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and Particle Filtering, can then be applied. In addition to the asymptotic normality of the tail of this series, we establish explicit, nonasymptotic bounds on the approximation error. Their proofs follow classical Fourier-analytic arguments, using Esséen's smoothing lemma. Specifically, we consider the distance between the distributions of: $(i)$~the tail of the series and an appropriate Gaussian; $(ii)$~the full series and the truncated series; and $(iii)$~the full series and the truncated series with an added Gaussian term. In all three cases, sharp bounds are established, and the theoretical results are compared with the actual distances (computed numerically) in specific examples of symmetric $α$-stable distributions. This analysis facilitates the selection of appropriate truncations in practice and offers theoretical guarantees for the accuracy of resulting estimates. One of the main conclusions obtained is that, for the purposes of inference, the use of a truncated series together with an approximately Gaussian error term has superior statistical properties and is likely a preferable choice in practice.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.