Paper detail

Nonadiabatic single-qubit quantum Otto engine

According to Clausius formulation of the second law of thermodynamics, for any thermal machine withdrawing heats $Q_{1,2}$ from two heat reservoirs at temperatures $T_{1,2}$, it holds $Q_1/T_1+Q_2/T_2 \leq 0$. Combined with the observation that the quantity $Q_1+Q_2$ is the work $W$ done by the system, that inequality tells that only 4 possible operation modes are possible for the thermal machine, namely heat engine [E], refrigerator [R], thermal accelerator [A] and heater [H]. We illustrate their emergence in the finite time operation of a quantum Otto engine realised with a single qubit. We first focus on the ideal case when isothermal and thermally-insulated strokes are well separated, and give general results as well as results pertaining to the specific finite-time Landau-Zener dynamics. We then present realistic results pertaining to the solid-state experimental implementation proposed by Karimi and Pekola [Phys. Rev. B \textbf{94} (2016) 184503]. That device is non-adiabatic both in the quantum mechanical sense and in the thermodynamical sense. Oscillations in the power extracted from the baths due to coherent LZ tunnelling at too low temperatures are observed that might hinder the robustness of the operation of the device against experimental noise on the control parameters.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.