Paper detail

Non$-$zero $ θ_{13} $ and $ δ_{CP} $ phase with $ A_{4} $ Flavor Symmetry and Deviations to Tri$-$Bi$-$Maximal mixing via $ Z_{2} \times Z_{2}$ invariant perturbations in the Neutrino sector

In this work, a flavour theory of a neutrino mass model based on $ A_{4} $ symmetry is considered to explain the phenomenology of neutrino mixing. The spontaneous symmetry breaking of $ A_{4} $ symmetry in this model leads to tribimaximal mixing in the neutrino sector at a leading order. We consider the effect of $ Z_{2} \times Z_{2}$ invariant perturbations in neutrino sector and find the allowed region of correction terms in the perturbation matrix that is consistent with 3$ σ$ ranges of the experimental values of the mixing angles. We study the entanglement of this formalism on the other phenomenological observables, such as $ δ_{CP} $ phase, the neutrino oscillation probability $ P(ν_μ\rightarrow ν_{e} )$, the effective Majorana mass $ |m_{ee} |$ and $ |m^{eff}_{νe} |$. A $ Z_{2} \times Z_{2}$ invariant perturbations in this model is introduced in the neutrino sector which leads to testable predictions of $ θ_{13} $ and CP violation. By changing the magnitudes of perturbations in neutrino sector, one can generate viable values of $ δ_{CP} $ and neutrino oscillation parameters. Next we investigate the feasibility of charged lepton flavour violation in type-I seesaw models with leptonic flavour symmetries at high energy that leads to tribimaximal neutrino mixing. We consider an effective theory with an $A_{4} \times Z_{2} \times Z_{2} $ symmetry, which after spontaneous symmetry breaking at high scale which is much higher than the electroweak scale leads to charged lepton flavour violation processes once the heavy Majorana neutrino mass degeneracy is lifted either by renormalization group effects or by a soft breaking of the $ A_{4} $ symmetry. In this context the implications for charged lepton flavour violation processes like $ μ\rightarrow e γ$, $ τ\rightarrow e γ$, $ τ\rightarrow μγ$ are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.