Paper detail

Non-uniform growth and surface friction determine bacterial biofilm morphology on soft substrates

During development, organisms acquire three-dimensional shapes with important physiological consequences. While the basic mechanisms underlying morphogenesis are known in eukaryotes, it is often difficult to manipulate them in vivo. To circumvent this issue, here we present a study of developing Vibrio cholerae biofilms grown on agar substrates in which the spatiotemporal morphological patterns were altered by varying the agar concentration. Expanding biofilms are initially flat, but later experience a mechanical instability and become wrinkled. Whereas the peripheral region develops ordered radial stripes, the central region acquires a zigzag herringbone-like wrinkle pattern. Depending on the agar concentration, the wrinkles initially appear either in the peripheral region and propagate inward (low agar concentration) or in the central region and propagate outward (high agar concentration). To understand these experimental observations, we developed a model that considers diffusion of nutrients and their uptake by bacteria, bacterial growth/biofilm matrix production, mechanical deformation of both the biofilm and the agar, and the friction between them. Our model demonstrates that depletion of nutrients beneath the central region of the biofilm results in radially-dependent growth profiles, which in turn, produce anisotropic stresses that dictate the morphology of wrinkles. Furthermore, we predict that increasing surface friction (agar concentration) reduces stress anisotropy and shifts the location of the maximum compressive stress, where the wrinkling instability first occurs, toward the center of the biofilm, in agreement with our experimental observations. Our results are broadly applicable to bacterial biofilms with similar morphologies and also provide insight into how other bacterial biofilms form distinct wrinkle patterns.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.