Paper detail

Non-trivial class of anisotropic compact stellar model in Rastall gravity

We investigated Rastall gravity, for an anisotropic star with a static spherical symmetry, whereas the matter-geometry coupling as assumed in Rastall Theory (RT) is expected to play a crucial role in differentiating RT from General Relativity (GR). Indeed, all the obtained results confirm that RT is not equivalent to GR, however, it produces the same amount of anisotropy as GR for static spherically symmetric stellar models. We used the observational constraints on the mass and the radius of the pulsar \textit{Her X-1} to determine the model parameters confirming the physical viability of the model. We found that the matter-geometry coupling in RT allows slightly less size than GR for a given mass. We confirmed the model viability via other twenty pulsars' observations. Utilizing the strong energy condition we determined an upper bound on compactness $U_\text{max}\sim 0.603$, in agreement with the Buchdahl limit, whereas Rastall parameter $ε=-0.1$. For a surface density compatible with a neutron core at nuclear saturation density, the mass-radius curve allows masses up to $3.53 M_\odot$. We note that there is no equation of state is assumed, however, the model fits well with a linear behavior. We split the twenty pulsars into four groups according to the boundary densities. Three groups are compatible with neutron cores while one group fits perfectly with higher boundary density $8\times 10^{14}$ g/cm$^3$ which suggests that those pulsars may have quark-gluon cores.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.