Paper detail

Non-subjective power analysis to detect G*E interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies in presence of confounding factor

It is generally acknowledged that most complex diseases are affected in part by interactions between genes and genes and/or between genes and environmental factors. Taking into account environmental exposures and their interactions with genetic factors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can help to identify high-risk subgroups in the population and provide a better understanding of the disease. For this reason, many methods have been developed to detect gene-environment (G*E) interactions. Despite this, few loci that interact with environmental exposures have been identified so far. Indeed, the modest effect of G*E interactions as well as confounding factors entail low statistical power to detect such interactions. In this work, we provide a simulated dataset in order to study methods for detecting G*E interactions in GWAS in presence of confounding factor and population structure. Our work applies a recently introduced non-subjective method for H1 simulations called waffect and exploits the publicly available HapMap project to build a datasets with real genotypes and population structures. We use this dataset to study the impact of confounding factors and compare the relative performance of popular methods such as PLINK, random forests and linear mixed models to detect G*E interactions. Presence of confounding factor is an obstacle to detect G*E interactions in GWAS and the approaches considered in our power study all have insufficient power to detect the strong simulated interaction. Our simulated dataset could help to develop new methods which account for confounding factors through latent exposures in order to improve power.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.