Paper detail

Non-standard neutrino interactions as a solution to the NO$ν$A and T2K discrepancy

The latest data of the two long-baseline accelerator experiments NO$ν$A and T2K, interpreted in the standard 3-flavor scenario, display a discrepancy. A mismatch in the determination of the standard CP-phase $δ_{\mathrm {CP}}$ extracted by the two experiments is evident in the normal neutrino mass ordering. While NO$ν$A prefers values close to $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 0.8 π$, T2K identifies values of $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 1.4 π$. Such two estimates are in disagreement at more than 90$\%$ C.L. for 2 degrees of freedom. We show that such a tension can be resolved if one hypothesizes the existence of complex neutral-current non-standard interactions (NSI) of the flavor changing type involving the $e-μ$ or the $e-τ$ sectors with couplings $|\varepsilon_{eμ}| \sim |\varepsilon_{eτ}|\sim 0.2$. Remarkably, in the presence of such NSI, both experiments point towards the same common value of the standard CP-phase $δ_{\mathrm {CP}} \sim 3π/2$. Our analysis also highlights an intriguing preference for maximal CP-violation in the non-standard sector with the NSI CP-phases having best fit close to $ϕ_{eμ} \sim ϕ_{eτ}\sim 3π/2$, hence pointing towards imaginary NSI couplings.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.