Paper detail

Non-Relational Databases on FPGAs: Survey, Design Decisions, Challenges

Non-relational database systems (NRDS), such as graph, document, key-value, and wide-column, have gained much attention in various trending (business) application domains like smart logistics, social network analysis, and medical applications, due to their data model variety and scalability. The broad data variety and sheer size of datasets pose unique challenges for the system design and runtime (incl. power consumption). While CPU performance scaling becomes increasingly more difficult, we argue that NRDS can benefit from adding field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) as accelerators. However, FPGA-accelerated NRDS have not been systematically studied, yet. To facilitate understanding of this emerging domain, we explore the fit of FPGA acceleration for NRDS with a focus on data model variety. We define the term NRDS class as a group of non-relational database systems supporting the same data model. This survey describes and categorizes the inherent differences and non-trivial trade-offs of relevant NRDS classes as well as their commonalities in the context of common design decisions when building such a system with FPGAs. For example, we found in the literature that for key-value stores the FPGA should be placed into the system as a smart network interface card (SmartNIC) to benefit from direct access of the FPGA to the network. However, more complex data models and processing of other classes (e.g., graph and document) commonly require more elaborate near-data or socket accelerator placements where the FPGA respectively has the only or shared access to main memory. Across the different classes, FPGAs can be used as communication layer or for acceleration of operators and data access. We close with open research and engineering challenges to outline the future of FPGA-accelerated NRDS.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.