Paper detail

Non-perturbative scaling behavior for net ionization of biologically relevant molecules by multiply-charged heavy-ion impact

A recently developed model to describe proton collisions from molecules involving basic atoms such as hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and phosphorus (H, C, N, O, P) is extended to treat collisions with multiply charged ions. The ion-atom collisions are computed using the two-center basis generator method (TC-BGM), which has a proven track record of yielding accurate total cross sections for electron capture and ionization. The atomic net ionization cross sections are then used to assemble two models for ion-molecule collisions: an independent atom model (IAM) that follows the Bragg additivity rule (labeled IAM-AR), and also the so-called pixel-counting method (IAM-PCM). The latter yields reduced cross sections relative to IAM-AR near the maximum, since it takes into account the overlapping nature of effective cross sectional areas. The IAM-PCM for higher-charge projectiles leads to strong reductions of net ionization cross sections relative to the IAM-AR method, and is computed directly for projectile charges $Q=1, 2, 3$. The scaling behavior of the IAM-PCM is investigated over a wide range of energies $E$, and at high $E$ it converges towards the IAM-AR. An empirical scaling rule is established which allows to reproduce these results based on proton impact calculations. Detailed comparisons are provided for the uracil target ($\rm C_4 H_4 N_2 O_2$), for which other theoretical as well as experimental results are available. Based on the scaling model derived from the IAM-PCM data it is shown how the experimental data for uracil and water bombarded by multiply charged ions can be reduced to effective $Q=1$ cross sections respectively, and these are compared to proton impact data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.