Paper detail

Non-perturbative Green's function method to determine the electronic spectral function due to electron-phonon interactions: Application to a graphene model from weak to strong coupling

In solid state physics, the electron-phonon interaction (EPI) is central to many phenomena. The theory of the renormalization of electronic properties due to EPIs became well established with the theory of Allen-Heine-Cardona, usually applied to second order in perturbation theory (P2). However, this is only valid in the weak coupling regime, while strong EPIs have been reported in many materials. Although non-perturbative (NP) methods have started to arise in the last years, they are usually not well justified, and it is not clear to what degree they reproduce the exact theory. To address this issue, we present a stochastic approach for the evaluation of the non-perturbative interacting Green's function in the adiabatic limit, and show it is equivalent to the Feynman expansion to all orders in the perturbation. Also, by defining a self-energy, we can reduce the effect of broadening needed in numerical calculations, improving convergence in the supercell size. In addition, we clarify whether it is better to average the Green's function or self-energy. Then we apply the method to a graphene tight-binding model, and obtain several interesting results: (i) The Debye-Waller term, which is normally neglected, does affect the change of the Fermi velocity. (ii) The P2 and NP self-energies differ even at room temperature for some k-points, raising the question of how well P2 works in other materials. (iii) Close to the Dirac point, positive and negative energy peaks merge. (iv) In the strong coupling regime, a peak appears at energy E=0, which is consistent with previous works on disorder and localization in graphene. (v) The spectral function becomes more asymmetric at stronger coupling and higher temperatures. Finally, in the Appendix we show that the method has better convergent properties when the coupling is strong relative to when it is weak, and discuss other technical aspects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.