Paper detail

Non-parametric study of the evolution of the cosmological equation of state with SNeIa, BAO and high redshift GRBs

We study the dark energy equation of state as a function of redshift in a non-parametric way, without imposing any {\it a priori} $w(z)$ (ratio of pressure over energy density) functional form. As a check of the method, we test our scheme through the use of synthetic data sets produced from different input cosmological models which have the same relative errors and redshift distribution as the real data. Using the luminosity-time $L_{X}-T_{a}$ correlation for GRB X-ray afterglows (the Dainotti et al. correlation), we are able to utilize GRB sample from the {\it Swift} satellite as probes of the expansion history of the Universe out to $z \approx 10$. Within the assumption of a flat FLRW universe and combining SNeIa data with BAO constraints, the resulting maximum likelihood solutions are close to a constant $w=-1$. If one imposes the restriction of a constant $w$, we obtain $w=-0.99 \pm 0.06$ (consistent with a cosmological constant) with the present day Hubble constant as $H_{0}=70.0 \pm 0.6$ ${\rm km} \, {\rm s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ and density parameter as $Ω_{Λ0}=0.723 \pm 0.025$, while non-parametric $w(z)$ solutions give us a probability map which is centred at $H_{0}=70.04 \pm 1$ ${\rm km} \, {\rm s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ and $Ω_{Λ0}=0.724 \pm 0.03$. Our chosen GRB data sample with full correlation matrix allows us to estimate the amount, as well as quality (errors) of data, needed to constrain $w(z)$ in the redshift range extending an order of magnitude in beyond the farthest SNeIa measured.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.