Paper detail

Non-parametric modeling of the cosmological data, base on the $χ^2$ distribution

In the $Λ$CDM model, cosmological observations from the late and recent universe reveal a puzzling $\sim 4.5σ$ tension in the current rate of universe expansion. In addition to the various scenarios suggested to resolve the tension, non-parametric modeling may provide useful insights. In this paper, we look at three well-known non-parametric methods, the smoothing method, the genetic algorithm, and the Gaussian process. Considering these three methods, we employ the recent Hubble parameters data to reconstruct the rate of universe expansion and supernovae Pantheon sample to reconstruct the luminosity distance. In contrast to the similar studies in the literature, the chi-squared distribution has been used to construct a reliable criterion to select a reconstruction. Finally, we compute the current rate of universe expansion ($H_0$) for each method, provide some discussions regarding the performance of each approach, and compare the results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.