Paper detail

Non-LTE effects on the lead and thorium abundance determinations for cool stars

Knowing accurate Pb abundances of metal-poor stars provides constraints on the Pb production mechanisms in the early Galaxy. Accurately deriving Th abundances permits a nucleo-chronometric age determination of the star. We improve the calculation of the Pb I and Th II lines in stellar atmospheres based on non-LTE line formation and evaluate the influence of departures from LTE on Pb and Th abundance determinations through a range of stellar parameters. Comprehensive model atoms for Pb I and Th II are presented. The departures from LTE lead to systematically depleted total absorption in the Pb I lines and positive abundance corrections. Non-LTE removes the discrepancy between the solar and the meteoritic Pb abundance. With the Holweger & Mueller (1974) solar model atmosphere, log eps(Pb, non-LTE) = 2.09. We revise the Pb and Eu abundances of the strongly r-process enhanced (r-II) stars CS 31082-001 and HE 1523-0901 and the Roederer et al. (2010) stellar sample. Our results provide strong evidence for universal Pb/Eu relative r-process yields during course of the Galaxy evolution. The stars with -2.3<[Fe/H]< -1.4 have, on average, 0.51 dex higher Pb/Eu ratios compared with that of the r-II stars suggesting that the s-process synthesis of Pb started as early as the time when Galactic metallicity had grown to [Fe/H] = -2.3. The average Pb/Eu ratio of the -1.4<[Fe/H]< -0.59 stars is close to the solar value, in line with the predictions of Travaglio et al. (2001) that AGB stars with [Fe/H] ~ -1 provided the largest contribution to the solar s-nuclei of Pb. Non-LTE leads to weakened Th II lines. Overall, the abundance correction does not exceed +0.2 dex when collisions with H I atoms are taken into account in non-LTE calculations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.