Paper detail

Non-linear regression models for behavioral and neural data analysis

Regression models are popular tools in empirical sciences to infer the influence of a set of variables onto a dependent variable given an experimental dataset. In neuroscience and cognitive psychology, Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) -including linear regression, logistic regression, and Poisson GLM- is the regression model of choice to study the factors that drive participant's choices, reaction times and neural activations. These methods are however limited as they only capture linear contributions of each regressors. Here, we introduce an extension of GLMs called Generalized Unrestricted Models (GUMs), which allows to infer a much richer set of contributions of the regressors to the dependent variable, including possible interactions between the regressors. In a GUM, each regressor is passed through a linear or nonlinear function, and the contribution of the different resulting transformed regressors can be summed or multiplied to generate a predictor for the dependent variable. We propose a Bayesian treatment of these models in which we endow functions with Gaussian Process priors, and we present two methods to compute a posterior over the functions given a dataset: the Laplace method and a sparse variational approach, which scales better for large dataset. For each method, we assess the quality of the model estimation and we detail how the hyperparameters (defining for example the expected smoothness of the function) can be fitted. Finally, we illustrate the power of the method on a behavioral dataset where subjects reported the average perceived orientation of a series of gratings. The method allows to recover the mapping of the grating angle onto perceptual evidence for each subject, as well as the impact of the grating based on its position. Overall, GUMs provides a very rich and flexible framework to run nonlinear regression analysis in neuroscience, psychology, and beyond.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.