Paper detail

Non-linear quantum effects in electromagnetic radiation of a vortex electron

There is a controversy of how to interpret interactions of electrons with a large spatial coherence with light and matter. When such an electron emits a photon, it can do so either as if its charge were confined to a point within a coherence length, the region where a square modulus of a wave function $|ψ|^2$ is localized, or as a continuous cloud of space charge spread over it. This problem was addressed in a recent study R.~Remez, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 123}, 060401 (2019) where a conclusion was drawn in favor of the first (point) interpretation. Here we argue that there is an alternative explanation for the measurements reported in that paper, which relies on purely classical arguments and does not allow one to refute the second interpretation. We propose an experiment of Smith-Purcell radiation from a non-relativistic vortex electron carrying orbital angular momentum, which can unambiguously lead to the opposite conclusion. Beyond the paraxial approximation, the vortex packet has a non-point electric quadrupole moment, which grows as the packet spreads and results in a non-linear $L^3$-growth of the radiation intensity with the length $L$ of the grating when $L$ is much larger than the packet's Rayleigh length. Such a non-linear effect has never been observed for single electrons and, if detected, it would be a hallmark of the non-point nature of charge in a wave packet. Thus, two views on $|ψ|^2$ are complementary to each other and an electron radiates either as a point charge or as a continuous charge flow depending on the experimental conditions and on its quantum state. Our conclusions hold for a large class of non-Gaussian packets and emission processes for which the radiation formation length can exceed the Rayleigh length, such as Cherenkov radiation, transition radiation, diffraction radiation, and so forth.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.