Paper detail

Non-linear noise excitation and intermittency under high disorder

Consider the semilinear heat equation $\partial_t u = \partial^2_x u + λσ(u)ξ$ on the interval $[0\,,1]$ with Dirichlet zero boundary condition and a nice non-random initial function, where the forcing $ξ$ is space-time white noise and $λ>0$ denotes the level of the noise. We show that, when the solution is intermittent [that is, when $\inf_z|σ(z)/z|>0$], the expected $L^2$-energy of the solution grows at least as $\exp\{cλ^2\}$ and at most as $\exp\{cλ^4\}$ as $λ\to\infty$. In the case that the Dirichlet boundary condition is replaced by a Neumann boundary condition, we prove that the $L^2$-energy of the solution is in fact of sharp exponential order $\exp\{cλ^4\}$. We show also that, for a large family of one-dimensional randomly-forced wave equations, the energy of the solution grows as $\exp\{cλ\}$ as $λ\to\infty$. Thus, we observe the surprising result that the stochastic wave equation is, quite typically, significantly less noise-excitable than its parabolic counterparts.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.