Paper detail

Non-lattice simulation of supersymmetric gauge theories as a probe to quantum black holes and strings

In the past decade we have witnessed remarkable developments in the gauge-gravity duality, which suggested a new approach to superstring theory and quantum space-time. In this context it is important to study supersymmetric large-N gauge theories in the strongly coupled regime. I will summarize the results and insights obtained so far by non-lattice simulations. A simple example of the gauge-gravity duality is the one between 1d U(N) gauge theory with 16 supercharges and the so-called black 0-brane solution in type IIA supergravity. In order for this duality to be valid, one has to take the 't Hooft large-N limit and to take the strong coupling limit on the gauge theory side. The gauge theory can be regularized by fixing the gauge completely thanks to one dimension, and by introducing a Fourier mode cutoff. One can then use the standard RHMC algorithm to simulate the system. The energy calculated as a function of the temperature was compared with the results obtained from the gravity side based on the black hole thermodynamics. This confirmed the gauge-gravity duality with high accuracy and provided the microscopic origin of the black hole thermodynamics. From the calculation of the Wilson loop, one obtains the Schwarzschild radius of the dual geometry. One can actually use the present 1d model with supersymmetric mass deformation to study \mathcal{N}=4 super Yang-Mills theory on R \times S^3 based on a novel large-N reduction, which generalizes the original idea of Eguchi and Kawai. It is remarkable that we can now simulate the 4d superconformal field theory, which appears in the most typical case of the gauge-gravity duality known as the AdS/CFT correspondence. In particular, no fine-tuning is required unlike previous proposals based on the lattice regularization.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.