Paper detail

Non-invasive improvement of machining by reversible electrochemical doping: a proof of principle with computational modeling

We propose that the machinability of hard ceramics can be improved by reversible electrochemical doping. On the example of TiO2, we show in a combined density functional theory-molecular dynamics computational study that a small amount of intercalated lithium, which preserves the host structure and can be introduced reversibly, leads to a lowering of the strength of work materials and the cutting force. This is in spite of the fact that there are no significant modifications of the elastic constants at room temperature, i.e. the effect is mostly on plastic properties. This approach is expected to be applicable to a class of ceramics exhibiting similar mechanisms of host-dopant interactions and presents a reversible and non-destructive way of modifying mechanical properties.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.