Paper detail

Non-ideal MHD simulations of subcritical prestellar cores with non-equilibrium chemistry

Non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects are thought to be gravity's closest ally in overcoming the support of magnetic fields and in forming stars. Here, we modify the publicly available version of the adaptive mesh refinement code FLASH (Fryxell et al. 2000; Dubey et al. 2008) to include a detailed treatment of non-ideal MHD and study such effects in collapsing prestellar cores. We implement two very extended non-equilibrium chemical networks, the largest of which is comprised of $\sim$ 300 species and includes a detailed description of deuterium chemistry. The ambipolar-diffusion, Ohmic and Hall resistivities are then self-consistently calculated from the abundances of charged species. We present a series of 2-dimensional axisymmetric simulations where we vary the chemical model, cosmic-ray ionization rate, and grain distribution. We benchmark our implementation against ideal MHD simulations and previously-published results. We show that, at high densities ($n_{\rm{H_2}}>~10^6~\rm{cm^{-3}}$), the ion that carries most of the perpendicular and parallel conductivities is not $\rm{H_3^+}$ as was previously thought, but is instead $\rm{D_3^+}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.