Paper detail

Non-Hermitian extension of the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model in 3+1 and 1+1 dimensions

This paper presents a non-Hermitian PT-symmetric extension of the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model of quantum chromodynamics in 3+1 and 1+1 dimensions. In 3+1 dimensions, the SU(2)-symmetric NJL Hamiltonian $H_{\textrm{NJL}} = \barψ(-i γ^k \partial_k + m_0) ψ- G [ (\barψψ)^2 + (\barψi γ_5 \vecτ ψ)^2 ]$ is extended by the non-Hermitian, PT- and chiral-symmetric bilinear term $ig\barψγ_5 B_μ γ^μ ψ$; in 1+1 dimensions, where $H_{\textrm{NJL}}$ is a form of the Gross-Neveu model, it is extended by the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric but chiral symmetry breaking term $g \barψγ_5 ψ$. In each case, the gap equation is derived and the effects of the non-Hermitian terms on the generated mass are studied. We have several findings: in previous calculations for the free Dirac equation modified to include non-Hermitian bilinear terms, contrary to expectation, no real mass spectrum can be obtained in the chiral limit; in these cases a nonzero bare fermion mass is essential for the realization of PT symmetry in the unbroken regime. Here, in the NJL model, in which four-point interactions are present, we {\it do} find real values for the mass spectrum also in the limit of vanishing bare masses in both 3+1 and 1+1 dimensions, at least for certain specific values of the non-Hermitian couplings $g$. Thus, the four-point interaction overrides the effects leading to PT symmetry-breaking for these parameter values. Further, we find that in both cases, in 3+1 and in 1+1 dimensions, the inclusion of a non-Hermitian bilinear term can contribute to the generated mass. In both models, this contribution can be tuned to be small; we thus fix the fermion mass to its value when $m_0=0$ in the absence of the non-Hermitian term, and then determine the value of the coupling required so as to generate a bare fermion mass.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.