Paper detail

Non-gray, Month-long Brightening of KIC 8462852 in the Immediate Aftermath of a Deep Dip

We present an analysis of the results of long-term multi-band photometric monitoring of the enigmatic star, KIC 8462852. Observations in the $B$, $g'$, $V$, $r'$ and $I_C$ passbands have been acquired at University College London Observatory (UCLO) between May 2017 and September 2018. We interrogate the wavelength dependence of the $\sim$month-long dimming and brightening exhibited by the target star over an 85-day interval, immediately following a days-long $\sim5$ per cent drop in brightness on Julian Date (JD) 2458203. Between JD 2458215--300 we measure brightness variations which correspond to relative extinctions of $A_B/A_V = 1.39\pm0.27$, $A_{g'}/A_V = 1.16\pm0.11$, $A_{r'}/A_V = 0.80\pm0.25$ and $A_{Ic}/A_V = 0.49\pm0.19$, from which we infer an Angström absorption coefficient of $1.33\pm0.43$ ($R_V \simeq 3.2^{+2.6}_{-1.0}$). As with the days-long `dips', the wavelength dependence of the longer-term brightness variations must also be associated with extinction arising from a dust distribution containing a substantial fraction of sub-micron-sized grains. This implies some common mechanism is responsible for the star's variability over both these short and longer timescales.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.