Paper detail

Non-Gaussianity of the density distribution in accelerating universes II:N-body simulations

We explore the possibility of putting constraints on dark energy models with statistical property of large scale structure in the non-linear region. In particular, we investigate the $w$ dependence of non-Gaussianity of the smoothed density distribution generated by the nonlinear dynamics. In order to follow the non-linear evolution of the density fluctuations, we apply N-body simulations based on $P^3 M$ scheme. We show that the relative difference between non-Gaussianity of $w=-0.8$ model and that of $w=-1.0$ model is $0.67 %$ (skewness) and $1.2 %$ (kurtosis) for $R=8h^{-1}$ Mpc. We also calculate the correspondent quantities for $R=2h^{-1}$ Mpc, $3.0 %$ (skewness) and $4.5 %$ (kurtosis), and the difference turn out to be greater, even though non-linearity in this scale is so strong that the complex physical processes about galaxy formation affect the galaxy distribution. From this, we can expect that the difference can be tested by all sky galaxy surveys with the help of mock catalogs created by selection functions, which suggests that non-Gaussianity of the density distribution potentially plays an important role for extracting information on dark energy.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.