Paper detail

Non-full equivalence of the four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and Horndeksi gravity for Bianchi type I metric

The four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (4DEGB) gravity is proposed as a singular limit of the higher-dimensional EGB gravity with a rescaled coupling constant. Follow-up work indicates that the 4DEGB gravity may be equivalent to a special Horndeski gravity. However, the full equivalence of the two theories has not been proven. In this paper, we test the possible equivalence for Bianchi type I metric. We consider two symmetry choices of the extra dimensions in the 4DEGB gravity and obtain the explicit cosmological evolution equations of the theories. Our result shows that, for one symmetry choice, there is a correspondence between the 4DEGB gravity and the special Horndeski gravity. However, for the other symmetry choice, there is no correspondence between the two theories. Therefore, the 4DEGB gravity is not equivalent to the special Horndeski gravity for the general case.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.