Paper detail

Non-factorizable contribtion to $\bar{B_{d}^0} \to π^0 D^{0}$

The decay modes of the type $B \to π\, D $ are dynamically different. For the case $\bar{B_{d}^0} \to π^- D^{+} $ there is a substantial factorized contribution which dominates. In contrast, the decay mode $\bar{B_{d}^0} \to π^0 D^{0} $ has a small factorized contribution, being proportional to a very small Wilson coefficient combination. In this paper we calculate the relevant Wilson coefficients at one loop level in the heavy quark limits, both for the $b$-quark and the $c$-quark. We also emphasize that for the decay mode $\bar{B_{d}^0} \to π^0 D^{0}$ there is a sizeable non-factorizable contribution due long distance interactions, which dominate the amplitude. We estimate the branching ratio for this decay mode within our framework, which uses the heavy quark limits, both for the $b$- and the $c$-quarks. In addition, we treat energetic light ($u,d,s$) quarks within a variant of Large Energy Effective Theory and combine this with a new extension of chiral quark models. For reasonable values of the model dependent parameters of our model can account for at least 3/4 of the amplitude needed to explain the experimental branching ratio $\simeq 2.6 \times 10^{-4}$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.