Paper detail

Non-Expanding horizons: Multipoles and the Symmetry Group

It is well-known that blackhole and cosmological horizons in equilibrium situations are well-modeled by non-expanding horizons (NEHs). In the first part of the paper we introduce multipole moments to characterize their geometry, removing the restriction to axisymmetric situations made in the existing literature. We then show that the symmetry group $\mathfrak{G}$ of NEHs is a 1-dimensional extension of the BMS group $\mathfrak{B}$. These symmetries are used in a companion paper to define charges and fluxes on NHEs, as well as perturbed NEHs. They have physically attractive properties. Finally, it is generally not appreciated that $\mathcal{I}^\pm$ of asymptotically flat space-times are NEHs in the conformally completed space-time. Forthcoming papers will (i) show that $\mathcal{I}^\pm$ have a small additional structure that reduces $\mathfrak{G}$ to the BMS group $\mathfrak{B}$, and the BMS charges and fluxes can be recovered from the NEH framework; and, (ii) develop gravitational wave tomography for the late stage of compact binary coalescences: reading-off the dynamics of perturbed NEHs in the strong field regime (via evolution of their multipoles), from the waveform at $\mathcal{I}^+$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.