Paper detail

Non-Existence of Quintic Factorization for the Second Cuboid Polynomial $Q_{p,q}(t)$

We consider the even monic degree-$10$ second cuboid polynomial $Q_{p,q}(t)\in\mathbb{Z}[t]$ depending on coprime integers $p\neq q>0$. We exclude the existence of a splitting of type $5+5$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, i.e., a factorization of $Q_{p,q}(t)$ into two irreducible quintic polynomials. Since $Q_{p,q}(t)$ is even and satisfies $Q_{p,q}(0)\neq 0$, any such $5+5$ splitting is necessarily symmetric, meaning that it can be written in the normal form $Q_{p,q}(t)=R_{p,q}(t)\cdot (-R_{p,q}(-t))$. After a weighted normalization reducing to a one-parameter polynomial $Q_r(u)$ with $r=p/q\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}$, coefficient comparison and elimination via resultants show that a $5+5$ splitting forces the existence of a rational point on an explicitly defined plane curve $F(r,a)=0$. Passing to the quotient parameters $a=r y$ and $s=r^2$ yields an affine curve $f(s,y)=0$ such that, for each fixed $s>0$, the polynomial $f(s,\cdot)$ is of degree $16$. We compute and factor the discriminant $\mathrm{Disc}_y(f)$ and then use Sturm root counts to certify that $f(s,\cdot)$ has no real roots for every rational $s>0$ with $s\neq 1$. Hence $f(s,y)=0$ admits no rational solutions with $s>0$, $s\neq 1$, and consequently no quintic $5+5$ factorization occurs for $Q_{p,q}(t)$ when $p\neq q$.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.