Paper detail

Non-equilibrium superconductivity in superconducting resonators

We have calculated the non-equilibrium quasiparticle and phonon distributions $f(E)$, $n(Ω)$, where $E$ and $Ω$ are the quasiparticle and phonon energies respectively, generated by the photons of the probe signal of a low temperature superconducting resonator SR operating well-below its transition temperature $T_c$ as the absorbed probe power per unit volume $P_{abs}$ was changed. The calculations give insight into a rate equation estimate which suggests that the quasiparticle distributions can be driven far from the thermal equilibrium value for typical readout powers. From $f(E)$ the driven quasiparticle number density $N_{qp}$ and lifetime $τ_r$ were calculated. Using $N_{qp}$ we defined an effective temperature $T_N^*$ to describe the driven $f(E)$. The lifetime was compared to the distribution averaged thermal lifetime at $T_N^*$ and good agreement was found typically within a few percent. We used $f(E)$ to model a representative SR. The complex conductivity and hence the frequency dependence of the experimentally measured forward scattering parameter $S_{21}$ of the SR as a function of $P_{abs}$ were found. The non-equilibrium $S_{21}$ cannot be accurately modeled by a thermal distribution at an elevated temperature $T_{21}^*$ having a higher quality-factor in all cases studied and for low $P_{abs}$ $T_{21}^*\sim T_N^*$. Using $τ_r$ and $N_{qp}$ we determined the achievable Noise Equivalent Power of the resonator used as a detector as a function of $P_{abs}$. Simpler expressions for $T_N^*$ as a function of $P_{abs}$ were derived which give a very good account of $T_N^*$ and also $N_{qp}$ and $τ_r$. We conclude that multiple photon absorption from the probe increases the quasiparticle number above the thermal background and ultimately limits the achievable NEP of the resonator.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.