Paper detail

Non-equilibrium multi-scale analysis and coexistence in competing first passage percolation

The main contribution of this paper is the development of a novel approach to multi-scale analysis that we believe can be used to analyse processes with non-equilibrium dynamics. Our approach will be referred to as \emph{multi-scale analysis with non-equilibrium feedback} and will be used to analyse a natural random growth process with competition on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ called \emph{first passage percolation in a hostile environment} that consists of two first passage percolation processes $FPP_1$ and $FPP_λ$ that compete for the occupancy of sites. Initially, $FPP_1$ occupies the origin and spreads through the edges of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ at rate 1, while $FPP_λ$ is initialised at sites called \emph{seeds} that are distributed according to a product of Bernoulli measures of parameter $p\in(0,1)$, where a seed remains dormant until $FPP_1$ or $FPP_λ$ attempts to occupy it before then spreading through the edges of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ at rate $λ>0$. Particularly challenging aspects of FPPHE are its non-equilibrium dynamics and its lack of monotonicity (for instance, adding seeds could be benefitial to $FPP_1$ instead of $FPP_λ$); such characteristics, for example, prevent the application of a more standard multi-scale analysis. As a consequence of our main result for FPPHE, we establish a coexistence phase for the model for $d\geq3$, answering an open question in \cite{sidoravicius2019multi}. This exhibits a rare situation where a natural random competition model on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ observes coexistence for processes with \emph{different} speeds. Moreover, we are able to establish the stronger result that $FPP_1$ and $FPP_λ$ can both occupy a \emph{positive density} of sites with positive probability, which is in stark contrast with other competition processes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.