Paper detail

Non-equilibrium cooling rate for a collisionally cooled metal-enriched gas

We present self-consistent calculations of non-equilibrium (time-dependent) cooling rates for a dust-free collisionally controlled gas in wide temperature ($10 K\le T\le 10^8 K$) and metallicity ($10^{-4} Z_\odot \le Z \le 2 Z_\odot$) ranges. We confirm that molecular hydrogen dominates cooling at $10^2 \simlt T\simlt 10^4$ K and $Z\simlt 10^{-3} Z_\odot$. We find that the contribution from H$_2$ into cooling rate around $T\sim (4-5)\times 10^3$ K stimulates thermal instability in the metallicity range $Z\simlt 10^{-2} Z_\odot$. Isobaric cooling rates are generally lower than isochoric ones, because the associated increase of gas density leads to both more efficient hydrogen recombination and equilibration of the fine-structure level populations. Isochoric cooling keeps the ionization fraction remains quite high at $T\simlt10^4$ K: up to $\sim0.01$ at $T\simeq 10^3$ K and $Z\simlt 0.1 Z_\odot$, and even higher at higher metallicity, contrary to isobaric cooling where it at least an order of magnitude lower. Despite this increase in ionization fraction the gas-phase formation rate of molecular hydrogen (via H$^-$) lowers with metallicity, because higher metallicity shorttens the evolution time. We implement our self-consistent cooling rates into the multi-dimensional parallel code ZEUS-MP in order to simulate evolution of a supernova remnant, and compare it with an analogous model with tabulated cooling rates published in previous works. We find significant differences between the two descriptions, which may appear, e.g., in mixing of the ejected metals in the circumstellar medium.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.