Paper detail

Non-dipolar magnetic field at the polar cap of neutron stars and the physics of pulsar radiation

Despite the fact that pulsars have been observed for almost half a century, many questions have remained unanswered. We use the analysis of X-ray observations in order to study the polar cap region of radio pulsars. The size of the hot spots implies that the magnetic field configuration just above the stellar surface differs significantly from a purely dipole one. We can estimate the surface magnetic field as of the order of $10^{14}\,{\rm G}$. On the other hand, the temperature of the hot spots is about a few million Kelvins. Based on these two facts the Partially Screened Gap (PSG) model was proposed to describe the Inner Acceleration Region (IAR). The PSG model assumes that the temperature of the actual polar cap is equal to the so-called critical value, i.e. the temperature at which the outflow of thermal ions from the surface screens the gap completely. We have found that, depending on the conditions above the polar cap, the generation of high energetic photons in IAR can be caused either by Curvature Radiation (CR) or by Inverse Compton Scattering (ICS). This results in two different scenarios of breaking the acceleration gap: the so-called PSG-off mode for CR-dominated gaps and the PSG-on mode ICS-dominated gaps. The existence of two different mechanisms of gap breakdown naturally explains the mode-changing and the pulse nulling. Furthermore, the mode changes of the IAR may explain the anti-correlation of radio and X-ray emission in very recent observations of PSR B0943+10 (Hermsen et al., 2013). Simultaneous analysis of X-ray and radio properties have allowed to develop a model which explains the drifting subpulse phenomenon. According to this model the drift takes place when the charge density in IAR differs from the Goldreich-Julian co-rotational density. The proposed model allows to verify both the radio drift parameters and X-ray efficiency of the observed pulsars.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.