Paper detail

Non-degeneracy conditions for braided finite tensor categories

For a braided finite tensor category $\mathcal{C}$ with unit object $1 \in \mathcal{C}$, Lyubashenko considered a certain Hopf algebra $\mathbb{F} \in \mathcal{C}$ endowed with a Hopf pairing $ω: \mathbb{F} \otimes \mathbb{F} \to 1$ to define the notion of a `non-semisimple' modular tensor category. We say that $\mathcal{C}$ is non-degenerate if the Hopf pairing $ω$ is non-degenerate. In this paper, we show that $\mathcal{C}$ is non-degenerate if and only if it is factorizable in the sense of Etingof, Nikshych and Ostrik, if and only if its Müger center is trivial, if and only if the linear map $Ω: \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(1, \mathbb{F}) \to \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(\mathbb{F}, 1)$ induced by the pairing $ω$ is invertible. As an application, we prove that the category of Yetter-Drinfeld modules over a Hopf algebra in $\mathcal{C}$ is non-degenerate if and only if $\mathcal{C}$ is.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.