Non-commutative Lévy processes for generalized (particularly anyon) statistics

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let T=RdT=\mathbb R^d. Let a function Q:T2→CQ:T^2\to\mathbb C satisfy Q(s,t)=Q(t,s)ˉQ(s,t)=\bar{Q(t,s)} and ∣Q(s,t)∣=1|Q(s,t)|=1. A generalized statistics is described by creation operators ∂t†\partial_t^† and annihilation operators ∂t\partial_t, t∈Tt\in T, which satisfy the QQ-commutation relations. From the point of view of physics, the most important case of a generalized statistics is the anyon statistics, for which Q(s,t)Q(s,t) is equal to qq if s<ts<t, and to qˉ\bar q if s>ts>t. Here q∈Cq\in\mathbb C, ∣q∣=1|q|=1. We start the paper with a detailed discussion of a QQ-Fock space and operators (∂t†,∂t)t∈T(\partial_t^†,\partial_t)_{t\in T} in it, which satisfy the QQ-commutation relations. Next, we consider a noncommutative stochastic process (white noise) ω(t)=∂t†+∂t+λ∂t†∂tω(t)=\partial_t^†+\partial_t+λ\partial_t^†\partial_t, t∈Tt\in T. Here λ∈Rλ\in\mathbb R is a fixed parameter. The case λ=0λ=0 corresponds to a QQ-analog of Brownian motion, while λ≠0λ\ne0 corresponds to a (centered) QQ-Poisson process. We study QQ-Hermite (QQ-Charlier respectively) polynomials of infinitely many noncommutatative variables (ω(t))t∈T(ω(t))_{t\in T}. The main aim of the paper is to explain the notion of independence for a generalized statistics, and to derive corresponding Lévy processes. To this end, we recursively define QQ-cumulants of a field (ξ(t))t∈T(ξ(t))_{t\in T}. This allows us to define a QQ-Lévy process as a field (ξ(t))t∈T(ξ(t))_{t\in T} whose values at different points of TT are QQ-independent and which possesses a stationarity of increments (in a certain sense). We present an explicit construction of a QQ-Lévy process, and derive a Nualart-Schoutens-type chaotic decomposition for such a process.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.