Paper detail

Non-circular motions and the cusp-core discrepancy in dwarf galaxies

Context. The cusp-core discrepancy is one of the major problems in astrophysics. It results from comparing the observed mass distribution of galaxies with the predictions of Cold Dark Matter simulations. The latter predict a cuspy density profile in the inner parts of galaxies, whereas observations of dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies show a constant density core. Aims. We want to determine the shape of the dark matter potential in the nuclear regions of a sample of six nearby irregular dwarf galaxies. Methods. In order to quantify the amount of non-circular motions which could potentially affect a mass decomposition, we first perform a harmonic decomposition of the HI Hermite velocity fields of all sample galaxies. We then decompose the HI rotation curves into different mass components by fitting NFW and pseudo-isothermal halo models to the HI rotation curves using a chi^2 minimisation. We model the minimum-disc, the minimum-disc+gas, and the maximum-disc cases. Results. The non-circular motions are in all cases studied here of the order of only a few km/s (generally corresponding to less than 25% of the local rotation velocity), which means that they do not significantly affect the rotation curves. The observed rotation curves can better be described by the cored pseudo-isothermal halo than by the NFW halo. The slopes of the dark matter density profiles confirm this result and are in good agreement with previous studies. The quality of the fits can often be improved when including the baryons, which suggests that they contribute significantly to the inner part of the density profile of dwarf galaxies.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.