Paper detail

Non-Archimedean Whitney stratifications

We define "t-stratifications", a strong notion of stratifications for Henselian valued fields $K$ of equi-characteristic 0, and prove that they exist. In contrast to classical stratifications in Archimedean fields, t-stratifications also contain non-local information about the stratified sets. For example, they do not only see the singularities in the valued field, but also those in the residue field. Like Whitney stratifications, t-stratifications exist for different classes of subsets of $K^n$, e.g. algebraic subvarieties or certain classes of analytic subsets. The general framework are definable sets (in the sense of model theory) in a language that satisfies certain hypotheses. We give two applications. First, we show that t-stratifications in suitable valued fields $K$ induce classical Whitney stratifications in $\Bbb R$ or $\Bbb C$; in particular, the existence of t-stratifications implies the existence of Whitney stratifications. This uses methods of non-standard analysis. Second, we show how, using t-stratifications, one can determine the ultra-metric isometry type of definable subsets of $\Bbb Z_p^n$ for $p$ sufficiently big. For those $p$, this proves a conjecture stated in a previous article. In particular, this yields a new, geometric proof of the rationality of Poincaré series.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.