Paper detail

Non-Archimedean Koksma inequalities, variation, and Fourier analysis

We examine four different notions of variation for real-valued functions defined on the compact ring of integers of a non-Archimedean local field, with an emphasis on regularity properties of functions with finite variation, and on establishing non-Archimedean Koksma inequalities. The first version of variation is due to Taibleson, the second due to Beer, and the remaining two are new. Taibleson variation is the simplest of these, but it is a coarse measure of irregularity and it does not admit a Koksma inequality. Beer variation can be used to prove a Koksma inequality, but it is order-dependent and not translation invariant. We define a new version of variation which may be interpreted as the graph-theoretic variation when a function is naturally extended to a certain subtree of the Berkovich affine line. This variation is order-free and translation invariant, and it admits a Koksma inequality which, for a certain natural family of examples, is always sharper than Beer's. Finally, we define a Fourier-analytic variation and a corresponding Koksma inequality which is sometimes sharper than the Berkovich-analytic inequality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.