Paper detail

Non-Adiabatic Effects on Electron Beam Quality for Frequency-Tunable Gyrotrons

We propose an unconventional electron gun structure in which the emitter is located on a concave cathode surface with a non-uniform electric field. Such a design violates the intuition that an emitter should place close to a uniform electric field to reduce the velocity spread. The commonly employed design guide based on the adiabatic condition predicts a huge velocity spread of 24%, but the simulation using EGUN code and verified with CST particle studio shows a very low spread of 2.8%. Examining the magnetic moment and the kinetic energy of the beam reveals that the electrons experience a relatively long acceleration process due to the much weak electric field. That's why the non-adiabatic effect matters. In addition to the cyclotron compression and the E$\times$B drift, the "resonant" polarization drift plays a crucial role in reducing the overall velocity spread.Simulations show a decent beam quality with the pitch factor of 1.5 and the transverse velocity spread of 2.8% over a wide range of the magnetic field (7.4-8.0 T) and the beam voltage (12-22 kV) with a high structural tolerance. The promising results with the wide working range enable the development of continuous frequency-tunable gyrotrons.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.