Paper detail

Non-Adaptive Group Testing based on Sparse Pooling Graphs

In this paper, an information theoretic analysis on non-adaptive group testing schemes based on sparse pooling graphs is presented. The binary status of the objects to be tested are modeled by i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with probability p. An (l, r, n)-regular pooling graph is a bipartite graph with left node degree l and right node degree r, where n is the number of left nodes. Two scenarios are considered: a noiseless setting and a noisy one. The main contributions of this paper are direct part theorems that give conditions for the existence of an estimator achieving arbitrary small estimation error probability. The direct part theorems are proved by averaging an upper bound on estimation error probability of the typical set estimator over an (l,r, n)-regular pooling graph ensemble. Numerical results indicate sharp threshold behaviors in the asymptotic regime.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.