Paper detail

Non-adaptive Combinatorial Quantitative Group Testing with Adversarially Perturbed Measurements

In this paper, combinatorial quantitative group testing (QGT) with noisy measurements is studied. The goal of QGT is to detect defective items from a data set of size $n$ with counting measurements, each of which counts the number of defects in a selected pool of items. While most literatures consider either probabilistic QGT with random noise or combinatorial QGT with noiseless measurements, our focus is on the combinatorial QGT with noisy measurements that might be adversarially perturbed by additive bounded noises. Since perfect detection is impossible, a partial detection criterion is adopted. With the adversarial noise being bounded by $d_n = Θ(n^δ)$ and the detection criterion being to ensure no more than $k_n = Θ(n^κ)$ errors can be made, our goal is to characterize the fundamental limit on the number of measurement, termed \emph{pooling complexity}, as well as provide explicit construction of measurement plans with optimal pooling complexity and efficient decoding algorithms. We first show that the fundamental limit is $\frac{1}{1-2δ}\frac{n}{\log n}$ to within a constant factor not depending on $(n,κ,δ)$ for the non-adaptive setting when $0<2δ\leq κ<1$, sharpening the previous result by Chen and Wang [2]. We also provide an explicit construction of a non-adaptive deterministic measurement plan with $\frac{1}{1-2δ}\frac{n}{\log_{2} n}$ pooling complexity up to a constant factor, matching the fundamental limit, with decoding complexity being $o(n^{1+ρ})$ for all $ρ> 0$, nearly linear in $n$, the size of the data set.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.