Paper detail

Non-Abelian Berry phase for open quantum systems: Topological protection vs geometric dephasing

We provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the adiabatic evolution of degenerate open quantum systems, where the dynamics is induced by time-dependent fluctuating loop paths in control parameter space. For weak system-bath coupling, the fluctuations around a deterministic base path obey Gaussian statistics, where we assume that the quantum adiabatic theorem is also satisfied for fluctuating paths. We show that universal non-Abelian geometric dephasing (NAGD) contributions are contained in the fluctuation-averaged evolution operator. This operator plays a key role in all experimental protocols proposed in this work for the detection of NAGD. In particular, we formulate interference measurements providing full access to NAGD. Apart from a factor due to the dynamic phase and its fluctuations, the averaged evolution operator contains the averaged Berry matrix. A polar decomposition of this non-unitary matrix into the product of a unitary, $V$, and a positive semi-definite Hermitian matrix, $R$, reveals the physics of the NAGD contributions. Unlike the conventional dynamic dephasing rate, the NAGD eigenrates encoded by $R$ depend on the loop orientation sense and, in particular, change sign under a reversal of the direction. A negative rate then implies amplification of coherences as compared to the ones when only dynamic dephasing is present. The non-Abelian character of geometric dephasing is rooted in the non-commutativity of $V$ and $R$ and causes smoking-gun signatures in interference experiments. We also clarify why systems subject to topological protection do not show geometric dephasing. Without full protection, however, geometric dephasing can arise and has to be taken into account. As concrete application, we propose spin-echo NAGD detection protocols for modified Majorana braiding setups.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.