Paper detail

Noisy Group Testing with Side Information

Group testing has recently attracted significant attention from the research community due to its applications in diagnostic virology. An instance of the group testing problem includes a ground set of individuals which includes a small subset of infected individuals. The group testing procedure consists of a number of tests, such that each test indicates whether or not a given subset of individuals includes one or more infected individuals. The goal of the group testing procedure is to identify the subset of infected individuals with the minimum number of tests. Motivated by practical scenarios, such as testing for viral diseases, this paper focuses on the following group testing settings: (i) the group testing procedure is noisy, i.e., the outcome of the group testing procedure can be flipped with a certain probability; (ii) there is a certain amount of side information on the distribution of the infected individuals available to the group testing algorithm. The paper makes the following contributions. First, we propose a probabilistic model, referred to as an interaction model, that captures the side information about the probability distribution of the infected individuals. Next, we present a decoding scheme, based on the belief propagation, that leverages the interaction model to improve the decoding accuracy. Our results indicate that the proposed algorithm achieves higher success probability and lower false-negative and false-positive rates when compared to the traditional belief propagation especially in the high noise regime.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.